From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: fwd: [RFD] Explicitly documenting patch submission Date: 25 May 2004 16:17:50 -0500 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <1085519871.1882.220.camel@mulgrave> References: <1085420112.2255.81.camel@mulgrave> <1085421935.2780.21.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from stat1.steeleye.com ([65.114.3.130]:18623 "EHLO hancock.sc.steeleye.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265091AbUEYVSA (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 May 2004 17:18:00 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1085421935.2780.21.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Arjan van de Ven Cc: SCSI Mailing List On Mon, 2004-05-24 at 13:05, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Mon, 2004-05-24 at 19:35, James Bottomley wrote: > > The original message from Linus is here: > > > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=108529494402563 > > > > I've attached the text below as well. Unless anyone has strong > > objections, we'll begin to use this "signed-off-by" tag for SCSI > > submissions. > > Personally I don't think it's a good idea, nor do I think the RFD is > done yet... I don't thing the RFD is done yet either. I'm also not about to start rejecting patches because they don't conform. However, I will be accepting patches that do... James