From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pat LaVarre Subject: Re: CDC_RAM for lk 2.4, PATCH proposed Date: 03 Jun 2004 12:30:20 -0600 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <1086287419.11685.4.camel@patibmrh9> References: <20040520080622.GF1952@suse.de><1085090500.3822.20.camel@patibm rh9> <20040521065312.GK1952@suse.de><1085153286.6103.24.camel@patibmrh9> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from email-out2.iomega.com ([147.178.1.83]:18057 "EHLO email.iomega.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263614AbUFCSa2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jun 2004 14:30:28 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1085153286.6103.24.camel@patibmrh9> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Jens Axboe Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, John McKell Jens A: > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsi&m=108509426227562 > > > diff -Nurp linux-2.4.27-pre3/... linux-2.4.27-pre3-pel/... > > > > [snip] > > > > Patch looks fine to me, > > I'll send it to Marcelo for inclusion. Thanks! > > Wonderful news, thank you both, consequently now with more hope I look > forward to writing kernel patches exclusively for 2.6. Today 2004-6-3 I see no mention of the 5-21 CDC_RAM for lk 2.4 patch near such strings as "Marcelo" and "Axboe" in: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.4/testing/patch-2.4.27.log I will think go on naively believing that is the right place to poll until someone tells me different (or we all start working 2.4.28). Pat LaVarre