From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: PATCH: Further aacraid work Date: 17 Jun 2004 15:56:16 -0500 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <1087505777.2210.82.camel@mulgrave> References: <547AF3BD0F3F0B4CBDC379BAC7E4189FD2407B@otce2k03.adaptec.com> <20040617203842.GC8705@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <20040617204828.GC1495@holomorphy.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from stat1.steeleye.com ([65.114.3.130]:14804 "EHLO hancock.sc.steeleye.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263166AbUFQU6I (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jun 2004 16:58:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20040617204828.GC1495@holomorphy.com> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: William Lee Irwin III Cc: Alan Cox , "Salyzyn, Mark" , y@redhat.com, Clay Haapala , Christoph Hellwig , Linux Kernel , SCSI Mailing List On Thu, 2004-06-17 at 15:48, William Lee Irwin III wrote: > Say, could you guys try this? jejb seemed to get decent results with it. To quantify, my previous results showed 40 merges out of about 32k segments. With this patch running the same test, I show 24,007 merges out of 19513 segments (which is about a 55% merger rate). I also see merges up to 128 segments (the maximum allowed). James