From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>
Subject: RE: QLA2300, Infortrand and LBD?
Date: 21 Jun 2004 09:32:06 -0500
Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org
Message-ID: <1087828327.1797.22.camel@mulgrave>
References: <47F3C2BE74738E4683574107469DFA20433950@XYUSEX01.xyus.xyratex.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from stat1.steeleye.com ([65.114.3.130]:44754 "EHLO
	hancock.sc.steeleye.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S266262AbUFUOi3 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 21 Jun 2004 10:38:29 -0400
In-Reply-To: <47F3C2BE74738E4683574107469DFA20433950@XYUSEX01.xyus.xyratex.com>
List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
To: Frank Borich <Frank_Borich@us.xyratex.com>
Cc: "tester7 A." <benew666@hotmail.com>, SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>, tech@storageone.co.kr

On Mon, 2004-06-21 at 09:28, Frank Borich wrote:
> Is this true of both 2.4 and 2.6 ?

No, only 2.6 has the correct LBD support.

James