From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: PATCH [3/5] qla2xxx: TCQ fixes Date: 13 Jul 2004 09:29:37 -0500 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <1089728978.1798.16.camel@mulgrave> References: <20040712140558.GA6961@praka.san.rr.com> <1089668486.1799.62.camel@mulgrave> <40F32AAE.5070508@us.ibm.com> <40F348C4.7070600@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from stat16.steeleye.com ([209.192.50.48]:15021 "EHLO hancock.sc.steeleye.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265255AbUGMOaF (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jul 2004 10:30:05 -0400 In-Reply-To: <40F348C4.7070600@us.ibm.com> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Brian King Cc: Mike Christie , Andrew Vasquez , Linux-SCSI Mailing List , linux-iscsi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Krishna Murthy On Mon, 2004-07-12 at 21:28, Brian King wrote: > ipr is not interested in the tag numbers either, as the adapter > microcode generates them. Well, so does the qla2xxx. However, all such implementations use driver to controller handles which are direct tag equivalents (even if they're not the actual tags sent over the wire). "Tag" in this sense merely means identifying number from driver to host. James