From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Subject: Re: BK: scsi-misc cs inconsistencies?
Date: 14 Jul 2004 08:33:03 -0500
Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org
Message-ID: <1089811987.2222.12.camel@mulgrave>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.60.0407141209450.2892@poirot.grange>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from stat16.steeleye.com ([209.192.50.48]:59356 "EHLO
	hancock.sc.steeleye.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S267382AbUGNNdR (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 14 Jul 2004 09:33:17 -0400
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.60.0407141209450.2892@poirot.grange>
List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
To: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
Cc: SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>

On Wed, 2004-07-14 at 05:24, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Hello
> 
> I've searched scsi-misc cs-entries on bk, and they don't seem to be quite 
> consistent:
> 
> Linux kernel tree Search results for "tmscsim" in ChangeSet comments

If you mean you searched through the bk commits list, then yes, this is
what you see since change sets can renumber as trees are combined.

James