From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] let AIC7{9,X}XX_BUILD_FIRMWARE depend on!PREVENT_FIRMWARE_BUILD Date: 03 Aug 2004 12:31:55 -0700 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <1091561517.1942.0.camel@mulgrave> References: <20040801185543.GB2746@fs.tum.de> <20040801191118.GA7402@mars.ravnborg.org> <410FA577.4040602@adaptec.com> <410FBDAA.4070907@optonline.net> <1091550985.2816.10.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> <410FD035.6080905@adaptec.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from adsl-64-109-89-108.dsl.chcgil.ameritech.net ([64.109.89.108]:45514 "EHLO redscar") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266807AbUHCTb7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Aug 2004 15:31:59 -0400 In-Reply-To: <410FD035.6080905@adaptec.com> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Luben Tuikov Cc: Arjan van de Ven , Nathan Bryant , Sam Ravnborg , "Justin T. Gibbs" , Adrian Bunk , SCSI Mailing List , Linux Kernel On Tue, 2004-08-03 at 10:49, Luben Tuikov wrote: > Yes, no problem. Whatever you guys want. > I can provide small incremental patches (right out of > perforce), and generate incremantal BKs (will have to look into > that). Actually, small incremental patches across the scsi list is what I'd prefer. I can take care of doing the BK stuff to pull the patches straight off the list. James