From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nigel Cunningham Subject: Re: [PATCH] SCSI midlayer power management Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 08:43:27 +1000 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <1092350607.24776.24.camel@laptop.cunninghams> References: <4119611D.60401@optonline.net> <20040811080935.GA26098@elf.ucw.cz> <411A1B72.1010302@optonline.net> <1092231462.2087.3.camel@mulgrave> <1092267400.2136.24.camel@gaston> <1092314892.1755.5.camel@mulgrave> <20040812131457.GB1086@elf.ucw.cz> <1092328173.2184.15.camel@mulgrave> <20040812191120.GA14903@elf.ucw.cz> <1092339247.1755.36.camel@mulgrave> <1092350198.24737.19.camel@laptop.cunninghams> Reply-To: ncunningham@linuxmail.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail5.tpgi.com.au ([203.12.160.101]:1159 "EHLO mail5.tpgi.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268850AbUHLWqt (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Aug 2004 18:46:49 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1092350198.24737.19.camel@laptop.cunninghams> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley Cc: Pavel Machek , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Nathan Bryant , Linux SCSI Reflector , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Jeff Garzik Howdy again. On Fri, 2004-08-13 at 08:36, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > I'm not pretending to understand the issues you're talking about, but I > do have a question that might possibly be helpful: Pages can be marked > with the Nosave flag, so that they're not saved in the image and not > overwritten when we copy the old kernel back. Would using Nosave help > here at all? Having read the rest of the thread, I can see that's probably not helpful :> Nigel -- Nigel Cunningham Christian Reformed Church of Tuggeranong PO Box 1004, Tuggeranong, ACT 2901 Many today claim to be tolerant. But true tolerance can cope with others being intolerant.