From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lee Revell Subject: Re: [patch] 2.6.9-rc1-mm1: megaraid_mbox.c compile error with gcc 3.4 Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 16:17:16 -0400 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <1093724235.8611.67.camel@krustophenia.net> References: <0E3FA95632D6D047BA649F95DAB60E57033BC9BB@exa-atlanta> <20040828130419.57a56cdd.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from viper.oldcity.dca.net ([216.158.38.4]:4017 "HELO viper.oldcity.dca.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S267976AbUH1URN (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Aug 2004 16:17:13 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20040828130419.57a56cdd.akpm@osdl.org> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Andrew Morton Cc: "Mukker, Atul" , bunk@fs.tum.de, sreenib@lsil.com, Manojj@lsil.com, linux-kernel , James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2004-08-28 at 16:04, Andrew Morton wrote: > "Mukker, Atul" wrote: > > > > The driver and the patches with the re-ordered functions is available at > > ftp://ftp.lsil.com/pub/linux-megaraid/drivers/version-2.20.3.1/ > > I dunno about James, but I *really* dislike receiving patches by going and > getting them from internet servers. It breaks our commonly-used tools. It > loses authorship info. It loses Signed-off-by: info. There is no > changelog. All this means that your patch is more likely to be ignored by > busy people. Please, just email the diffs. > The FAQ should be updated, as it recommends posting a link to large patches, rather than splitting them up and posting that way. Of course, there is a lot in the FAQ that needs updating... Lee