From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: SCSI QLA not working on latest *-mm SN2 Date: 21 Sep 2004 12:24:57 -0400 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <1095783904.2467.176.camel@mulgrave> References: <20040917183029.GW642@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <200409211205.22575.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> <1095783077.2467.145.camel@mulgrave> <200409211218.00809.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from stat16.steeleye.com ([209.192.50.48]:16343 "EHLO hancock.sc.steeleye.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267823AbUIUQZ2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Sep 2004 12:25:28 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200409211218.00809.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Jesse Barnes Cc: Matthew Wilcox , Grant Grundler , Andrew Vasquez , pj@sgi.com, SCSI Mailing List , mdr@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com, jeremy@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com, djh@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com, Andrew Morton On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 12:18, Jesse Barnes wrote: > Well then. Sounds like we're hosed for the qla2xxx case at least. I think we > still need pioflush for the case of writes from different CPUs (described in > the document). Using it *should* make the window pretty small for qla2xxx > type problems too, but we have no guarantee. Not if we can do a PIO write ... PIO writes aren't posted. James