From: Andrew Vasquez <andrew.vasquez@qlogic.com>
To: Jeremy Higdon <jeremy@sgi.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>,
SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2.6.9-rc2] Add sysfs queue depth override to qla2xxx
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 09:41:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1096476093.10859.73.camel@praka> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040929003611.GK192475@sgi.com>
On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 17:36, Jeremy Higdon wrote:
> So do we have a consensus on what the driver should limit queue
> depth to? Currently, it's 32 or ql2xmaxqdepth, if that was specified.
> From what I can see, ql2xmaxqdepth is effectively limited to 65535.
>
> We don't want one lun to use host driver or host adapter resources
> to the point that it starves other luns. Ideally, the max would
> depend on what else was attached, but I don't think we want to
> make this too complicated.
I agree.
> Anyone changing the queue depth should
> have a clue about what they're doing.
>
> Andrew, how many command slots are there in the various adapters,
> and do the continuation entries each eat a command slot?
>
Well, determining that can be complicated...
The request-queue size is based on the amount of SRAM available to the
ISP. For most HBAs (qla2100, qla2200, qla2300, qla2310, qla2342) which
have an 128KB memory chip (per-port), the 8.x driver will allocate
2048-entry queue for requests.
Many new(-er) boards (qla235x, qla236x) and embedded implementations
(fibre-down) have a 512KB or 1MB chip. Not wanting to digress into
another layer of firmware resource-usage details, let's just say that
the extra memory allows for the firmware to manage a larger number of
requests. The driver in these cases will allocate a 4096-entry
request-queue.
Now depending on the sizeof(dma_addr_t)
(qla2x00_config_dma_addressing()) a single (scsi_cmnd) command with 32
sg entries (assuming 4KB page size, transferring 128KB of data) will
consume:
sizeof(dma_addr_t) == 4 (32bit):
1 command IOCB (3 data segments)
5 continuation IOCBs (7 data segments per IOCB)
- only one entry within the last continuation IOCB used
--
6 request entries
and
sizeof(dma_addr_t) == 8 (64bit):
1 command IOCB (2 data segments)
6 continuation IOCBs (5 data segments per IOCB)
--
7 request entries
Extending the basic formula, to transfer X KBs of data, you'll consume:
32bit 64bit
-----------------
256KB - 10 14
512KB - 19 27 request entries
As an example, taking the 512KB transfer consuming 27 request entries,
having an 2048 request-queue depth will support the transfer of 75
(2048 / 27) concurrent 512KB transfer requests; ~150 concurrent requests
with an 4096 request-queue depth.
Here's another small table showing total requests per request's size
with an 2048 request-queue depth (multiply by 2 for an 4096 depth):
32bit 64bit
-----------------
128KB - 341 292
256KB - 204 146
512KB - 107 75 concurrent requests
I hope this answers your request-queue usage question.
I'm not sure if it brings us any closer to answering the question of
'what's the max queue-depth we support?' Is it even possible, since as
you mentioned earlier, the admin will have to possess some outside
knowledge (backend-storage, I/O type, I/O patterns) while tuning the
queue-depth value.
--
Andrew
aTypically you'll find 128KB of memory available to the ISP, in
thoseMost implementations tend the request-queue can be , typically
there is a 128KiB for each
> jeremy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-29 16:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-28 16:52 [RFC PATCH 2.6.9-rc2] Add sysfs queue depth override to qla2xxx Andrew Vasquez
2004-09-28 19:36 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-09-28 19:53 ` James Bottomley
2004-09-28 20:12 ` Jens Axboe
2004-09-28 20:34 ` Andrew Vasquez
2004-09-29 6:21 ` Jens Axboe
2004-09-29 6:57 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-09-29 6:56 ` Jens Axboe
2004-09-29 0:36 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-09-29 16:41 ` Andrew Vasquez [this message]
2004-09-29 22:12 ` Jeremy Higdon
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-09-28 16:54 Andrew Vasquez
2004-09-27 6:10 Jeremy Higdon
2004-09-27 6:25 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-09-28 7:54 ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-09-28 14:05 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1096476093.10859.73.camel@praka \
--to=andrew.vasquez@qlogic.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=jeremy@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox