From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: Core scsi layer crashes in 2.6.8.1 Date: 05 Oct 2004 11:01:02 -0500 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <1096992068.1765.32.camel@mulgrave> References: <1096401785.13936.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4162B345.9000806@rtr.ca> <1096988167.2064.7.camel@mulgrave> <200410051749.22245.oliver@neukum.org> <1096991666.2064.25.camel@mulgrave> <4162C474.8010505@rtr.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from stat16.steeleye.com ([209.192.50.48]:4527 "EHLO hancock.sc.steeleye.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S270002AbUJEQBT (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Oct 2004 12:01:19 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4162C474.8010505@rtr.ca> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Lord Cc: Oliver Neukum , Anton Blanchard , Alan Cox , Linux Kernel Mailing List , SCSI Mailing List On Tue, 2004-10-05 at 10:57, Mark Lord wrote: > James Bottomley wrote: > > > > It would add quite a bit of complexity to the reference counted > > aynchronous model to try and force synchronicity between queuecommand > > and scsi_remove_host in the mid-layer. Therefore it's much easier to > > let the LLD decide what to do with the command. > > Presumably the same is also true for scsi_remove_device() ? Yes. James