From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: Question about Request Sense case in scsi_lib.c Date: 13 Oct 2004 16:56:25 -0500 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <1097704592.1714.266.camel@mulgrave> References: <53CF1076699CD711B7DD0002A51363F1072A6E3A@exw-ks.ks.lsil.com> <20041013214629.GA30273@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from stat16.steeleye.com ([209.192.50.48]:22454 "EHLO hancock.sc.steeleye.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269866AbUJMV5R (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Oct 2004 17:57:17 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20041013214629.GA30273@osdl.org> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: 'Dave Olien' Cc: "Qi, Yanling" , Douglas Gilbert , Tim Pepper , SCSI Mailing List On Wed, 2004-10-13 at 16:46, 'Dave Olien' wrote: > Now, on to figuring out why some of these requeued commands > fail the requeue. Yes, I've been wondering that too ... either the second remap is wrong, or something goes awry with the segment recount on a requeue. In the unit attention, could you print out cmd->use_sg and cmd->request->nr_phys_segments ... just to see what values got set up the first time around, which might give a clue where to look for the problem. James