From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Subject: Re: PATCH: (as373) Let LLD specify INQUIRY length
Date: 15 Oct 2004 14:28:07 -0500
Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org
Message-ID: <1097868494.2588.23.camel@mulgrave>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0410151426180.1052-100000@ida.rowland.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from stat16.steeleye.com ([209.192.50.48]:54982 "EHLO
	hancock.sc.steeleye.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S268368AbUJOT2W (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 15 Oct 2004 15:28:22 -0400
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0410151426180.1052-100000@ida.rowland.org>
List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, SCSI development list <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>

On Fri, 2004-10-15 at 13:30, Alan Stern wrote:
> Nobody has responded to it.  Is there some particular person I should send
> this to?  Or should I change the patch, so that it merely addresses the
> issue at hand without simplifying the entire subroutine?

OK, sorry, I have it now ... it was in a reply to a patch that I'd
previously applied, so I thought I already had it.

James