From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
To: James.Smart@Emulex.Com
Cc: SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [Patch] Fix Suspend I/O block/unblock patch
Date: 16 Oct 2004 18:13:49 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1097968435.2283.341.camel@mulgrave> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0B1E13B586976742A7599D71A6AC733C08670E@xbl3.ma.emulex.com>
On Sat, 2004-10-16 at 16:59, James.Smart@Emulex.Com wrote:
> > Could you give an example of this problem? If there's a demonstrable
> > issue with device_for_each_child(), we can probably persuade Greg to
> > alter it.
>
> Here's the stack trace that was giving us headaches...
>
> Oct 11 10:04:37 daffy kernel: Debug: sleeping function called from invalid context at include/linux/rwsem.h:43
> Oct 11 10:04:37 daffy kernel: in_atomic():1, irqs_disabled():0
Yes, call from our own timer. I was slightly worried about the amount
of work the list might have to do in the timer. This provides another
excuse to move it to a workqueue.
How does the attached fare in this situation (it compiles but I have no
ability to test it)?
James
===== drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c 1.6 vs edited =====
--- 1.6/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c 2004-10-11 10:03:45 -05:00
+++ edited/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c 2004-10-16 18:03:28 -05:00
@@ -29,6 +29,8 @@
static void transport_class_release(struct class_device *class_dev);
static void host_class_release(struct class_device *class_dev);
+static void fc_timeout_blocked_host(void *data);
+static void fc_timeout_blocked_tgt(void *data);
#define FC_STARGET_NUM_ATTRS 4 /* increase this if you add attributes */
#define FC_STARGET_OTHER_ATTRS 0 /* increase this if you add "always on"
@@ -87,7 +89,8 @@
fc_starget_port_name(starget) = -1;
fc_starget_port_id(starget) = -1;
fc_starget_dev_loss_tmo(starget) = -1;
- init_timer(&fc_starget_dev_loss_timer(starget));
+ INIT_WORK(&fc_starget_dev_loss_work(starget),
+ fc_timeout_blocked_tgt, starget);
return 0;
}
@@ -99,7 +102,8 @@
* all transport attributes to valid values per host.
*/
fc_host_link_down_tmo(shost) = -1;
- init_timer(&fc_host_link_down_timer(shost));
+ INIT_WORK(&fc_host_link_down_work(shost),
+ fc_timeout_blocked_host, shost);
return 0;
}
@@ -353,7 +357,7 @@
* that fail to recover in the alloted time.
* @data: scsi target that failed to reappear in the alloted time.
**/
-static void fc_timeout_blocked_tgt(unsigned long data)
+static void fc_timeout_blocked_tgt(void *data)
{
struct scsi_target *starget = (struct scsi_target *)data;
@@ -388,7 +392,7 @@
fc_target_block(struct scsi_target *starget)
{
int timeout = fc_starget_dev_loss_tmo(starget);
- struct timer_list *timer = &fc_starget_dev_loss_timer(starget);
+ struct work_struct *work = &fc_starget_dev_loss_work(starget);
if (timeout < 0 || timeout > SCSI_DEVICE_BLOCK_MAX_TIMEOUT)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -396,10 +400,7 @@
device_for_each_child(&starget->dev, NULL, fc_device_block);
/* The scsi lld blocks this target for the timeout period only. */
- timer->data = (unsigned long)starget;
- timer->expires = jiffies + timeout * HZ;
- timer->function = fc_timeout_blocked_tgt;
- add_timer(timer);
+ schedule_delayed_work(work, timeout * HZ);
return 0;
}
@@ -424,7 +425,7 @@
* failure as the state machine state change will validate the
* transaction.
*/
- del_timer_sync(&fc_starget_dev_loss_timer(starget));
+ del_timer_sync(&fc_starget_dev_loss_work(starget).timer);
device_for_each_child(&starget->dev, NULL, fc_device_unblock);
}
@@ -436,7 +437,7 @@
* @data: scsi host that failed to recover its devices in the alloted
* time.
**/
-static void fc_timeout_blocked_host(unsigned long data)
+static void fc_timeout_blocked_host(void *data)
{
struct Scsi_Host *shost = (struct Scsi_Host *)data;
struct scsi_device *sdev;
@@ -475,7 +476,7 @@
{
struct scsi_device *sdev;
int timeout = fc_host_link_down_tmo(shost);
- struct timer_list *timer = &fc_host_link_down_timer(shost);
+ struct work_struct *work = &fc_host_link_down_work(shost);
if (timeout < 0 || timeout > SCSI_DEVICE_BLOCK_MAX_TIMEOUT)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -484,11 +485,7 @@
scsi_internal_device_block(sdev);
}
- /* The scsi lld blocks this host for the timeout period only. */
- timer->data = (unsigned long)shost;
- timer->expires = jiffies + timeout * HZ;
- timer->function = fc_timeout_blocked_host;
- add_timer(timer);
+ schedule_delayed_work(work, timeout * HZ);
return 0;
}
@@ -516,7 +513,7 @@
* failure as the state machine state change will validate the
* transaction.
*/
- del_timer_sync(&fc_host_link_down_timer(shost));
+ del_timer_sync(&fc_host_link_down_work(shost).timer);
shost_for_each_device(sdev, shost) {
scsi_internal_device_unblock(sdev);
}
===== include/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.h 1.5 vs edited =====
--- 1.5/include/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.h 2004-10-11 10:03:45 -05:00
+++ edited/include/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.h 2004-10-16 17:49:20 -05:00
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
uint64_t node_name;
uint64_t port_name;
uint32_t dev_loss_tmo; /* Remote Port loss timeout in seconds. */
- struct timer_list dev_loss_timer;
+ struct work_struct dev_loss_work;
};
#define fc_starget_port_id(x) \
@@ -40,18 +40,18 @@
(((struct fc_starget_attrs *)&(x)->starget_data)->port_name)
#define fc_starget_dev_loss_tmo(x) \
(((struct fc_starget_attrs *)&(x)->starget_data)->dev_loss_tmo)
-#define fc_starget_dev_loss_timer(x) \
- (((struct fc_starget_attrs *)&(x)->starget_data)->dev_loss_timer)
+#define fc_starget_dev_loss_work(x) \
+ (((struct fc_starget_attrs *)&(x)->starget_data)->dev_loss_work)
struct fc_host_attrs {
uint32_t link_down_tmo; /* Link Down timeout in seconds. */
- struct timer_list link_down_timer;
+ struct work_struct link_down_work;
};
#define fc_host_link_down_tmo(x) \
(((struct fc_host_attrs *)(x)->shost_data)->link_down_tmo)
-#define fc_host_link_down_timer(x) \
- (((struct fc_host_attrs *)(x)->shost_data)->link_down_timer)
+#define fc_host_link_down_work(x) \
+ (((struct fc_host_attrs *)(x)->shost_data)->link_down_work)
/* The functions by which the transport class and the driver communicate */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-16 23:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-16 21:59 [Patch] Fix Suspend I/O block/unblock patch James.Smart
2004-10-16 23:13 ` James Bottomley [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-10-14 14:31 James.Smart
2004-10-16 16:39 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1097968435.2283.341.camel@mulgrave \
--to=james.bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=James.Smart@Emulex.Com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox