From: christophe varoqui <christophe.varoqui@free.fr>
To: device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Cc: Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb@suse.de>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [multipath] SCSI device capacity mess
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 09:21:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1099120870.27274.37.camel@zezette> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041030004131.GA29908@beaverton.ibm.com>
> > I'm just saying we should stop on the first failed command (TUR) and not
> > retry to read all 64 sectors regardless. I can live with one error per
> > passive path, but 64 really kills the logs.
>
> That makes sense.
>
> What is the result of the TUR? I did not see any information about it in other posts in this thread.
>
the tur checker in multipath-tools report ghosts as failing.
> We should change state somehow if the TUR failed or was not ready, maybe
> call set_media_not_present(), or maybe change the sdev state to
> SDEV_OFFLINE - though that might cause extra logging.
>
> We might not normally every hit this since the scan (INQUIRY failure)
> would likely prevent the device from showing up at all.
scsi_id and INQUIRY succeed on ghost paths, which allow multipath to
group them with valid paths to the same LU.
> Plus, we only call sd_spinup_disk() during discovery and not on open,
> unlike the calls to sd_media_changed().
>
Would it be workable to add a scsi_devinfo flag for devices with ghosts.
If this flag is set and state is down, open calls sd_media_changed().
The multipath-tools and device-mapper will try as hard as possible to
avoid opening those device if not necessary, by grouping them in a low
priority path group.
regards,
--
christophe varoqui <christophe.varoqui@free.fr>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-30 7:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-26 23:27 [multipath] SCSI device capacity mess christophe varoqui
2004-10-26 21:34 ` James Bottomley
2004-10-26 21:46 ` christophe varoqui
2004-10-27 8:17 ` [dm-devel] " Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-10-27 8:42 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-10-27 18:51 ` Bryan Henderson
2004-10-29 14:12 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-10-29 16:48 ` Bryan Henderson
2004-10-27 19:02 ` christophe varoqui
2004-10-27 19:37 ` Eddie Williams
2004-10-27 20:19 ` christophe varoqui
2004-10-27 20:34 ` Greg Freemyer
2004-10-27 20:28 ` Philip R Auld
2004-10-27 21:57 ` James Bottomley
2004-10-28 11:37 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-10-28 18:14 ` Patrick Mansfield
2004-10-28 18:21 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-10-30 0:41 ` Patrick Mansfield
2004-10-30 1:01 ` Patrick Mansfield
2004-10-30 7:21 ` christophe varoqui [this message]
2004-10-30 8:22 ` christophe varoqui
2004-11-02 15:23 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-10-28 11:35 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1099120870.27274.37.camel@zezette \
--to=christophe.varoqui@free.fr \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lmb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox