From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Zeuthen Subject: Re: scsi "target1:0:0" Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 12:23:03 -0500 Message-ID: <1100625783.4546.4.camel@davidz> References: <1100622096.8606.104.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1100622800.2574.41.camel@mulgrave> <1100624154.8606.122.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20041116171018.GK26623@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:40353 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262064AbUKPRVK (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Nov 2004 12:21:10 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20041116171018.GK26623@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Kay Sievers , James Bottomley , SCSI Mailing List On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 17:10 +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > There you go, it's just another example of this one. It's just faulty > assumptions in hald by the looks of things. > Please explain how you expect userspace to keep track of the device tree and enforce policy if we don't get hotplug events for things in the middle of the tree? Thanks, David