From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Subject: Re: please revert [PATCH] s390: zfcp act enhancements
Date: 17 Nov 2004 10:18:53 -0600
Message-ID: <1100708343.1573.0.camel@mulgrave>
References: <OFF86F5C89.05E4D99D-ON42256F4F.0053FF45-42256F4F.005517B5@de.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from stat16.steeleye.com ([209.192.50.48]:56741 "EHLO
	hancock.sc.steeleye.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S262352AbUKQQT1 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 17 Nov 2004 11:19:27 -0500
In-Reply-To: <OFF86F5C89.05E4D99D-ON42256F4F.0053FF45-42256F4F.005517B5@de.ibm.com>
Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
To: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, BOEBLINGEN LINUX390 <linux390@de.ibm.com>, SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>

On Wed, 2004-11-17 at 09:29, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> James, are you willing to do the sign-off for the zfcp host adapater changes going
> upstream?

Sure .. I already do it for other FC adapters.

James