From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: [PATCH] gdth: cleanup compat clutter Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 10:29:06 -0600 Message-ID: <1104769747.5506.17.camel@mulgrave> References: <20050103155057.GA24467@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from stat16.steeleye.com ([209.192.50.48]:62122 "EHLO hancock.sc.steeleye.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261492AbVACQ32 (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Jan 2005 11:29:28 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20050103155057.GA24467@lst.de> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: achim_leubner@adaptec.com, SCSI Mailing List On Mon, 2005-01-03 at 16:50 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > - removes support for 2.2.x and 2.4.x without the full dma API > (<= 2.4.13 or 2.4.9rh) > - makes sure we don't acquire or release unessecary locks around > ->scsi_done - it's a small BH/softirq that doesn't care about > the callers lock state > - cleans up the 2.4 vs 2.6 compat code a little When you said 'gdth' I noticed we hadn't heard from Achim for a while, so I went back through the lists and pulled in some other gdth fixes (from Jens: the buggy highmem problem and the stack reduction one from Randy). Of course, now, yours doesn't apply: Patching file drivers/scsi/gdth.c 10 out of 131 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/scsi/gdth.c.rej Patching file drivers/scsi/gdth_proc.c 7 out of 26 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/scsi/gdth_proc.c.rej Could you re-roll against scsi-misc-2.6? Thanks, James