From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: Why is the kernel complaining about large SCSI LUNs Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 18:37:21 -0500 Message-ID: <1105141041.4151.32.camel@mulgrave> References: <1105115445.4151.11.camel@mulgrave> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from stat16.steeleye.com ([209.192.50.48]:6024 "EHLO hancock.sc.steeleye.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261730AbVAGXh2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jan 2005 18:37:28 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Maurice Volaski Cc: SCSI Mailing List On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 18:25 -0500, Maurice Volaski wrote: > Are you saying that MPT driver is seeing some garbage data where > there should be valid data structures and that garbage data is being > generated by the external hardware RAID attached to the card (the > only thing attached to it). I'm not saying anything yet, because I have insufficient data to form a conclusion. What I want to know is what the kernel was doing before it got this message. It currently looks like the REPORT_LUNS command didn't return any data in even though returned status was GOOD, so it's probably a fault either of the device or the controller. James