From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/10][RFC] linux-iscsi driver Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 18:45:18 -0600 Message-ID: <1105404318.4477.18.camel@mulgrave> References: <41E30855.9050203@cs.wisc.edu> <20050110232442.GB10138@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from stat16.steeleye.com ([209.192.50.48]:25066 "EHLO hancock.sc.steeleye.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262626AbVAKApf (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jan 2005 19:45:35 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20050110232442.GB10138@infradead.org> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Mike Christie , SCSI Mailing List On Mon, 2005-01-10 at 23:24 +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Can you kill the ugly iscsi-sfnet name? We also don't call out networking > code ipv4-swansea ;-) Simple iscsi should be enough, or if you think that's > confusing vs driver for hardware offload cards maybe sw-iscsi. Please not that can of worms again. For the time being I think iscsi-sfnet will do since there's still one other possible linux iscsi stack around. And we would probably have called our networking code ipv4-swansea if we also had an ipv4-bsd or something else one could use. In the long run, there will be only a single iscsi driver, and it can be renamed as such, but in the short term we're not ready to choose. James