From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Subject: Re: cciss CSMI via sysfs for 2.6
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 16:42:57 -0600
Message-ID: <1108766577.5764.29.camel@mulgrave>
References: <20050216164512.GA5734@beardog.cca.cpqcorp.net>
	 <20050218194628.GA24583@infradead.org>  <20050218200552.GC20171@kroah.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received: from stat16.steeleye.com ([209.192.50.48]:55211 "EHLO
	hancock.sc.steeleye.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S261543AbVBRWnR (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 18 Feb 2005 17:43:17 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20050218200552.GC20171@kroah.com>
Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, mike.miller@hp.com, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, mochel@osdl.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, eric.moore@lsil.com, SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>

On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 12:05 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> For a device?  It seems a huge overkill to add this attribute for
> _every_ device in the system, when only a small minority can actually
> use it.  Just put it as a default scsi or transport class attribute
> instead.

Actually, we might be able to do this as a simple attribute container
rather than a transport class, but I agree, it's not a generic property
of every device.

James