From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: [BK PATCH] SCSI updates for 2.6.11 Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 17:21:33 -0500 Message-ID: <1111011693.6544.5.camel@mulgrave> References: <1110934411.5685.39.camel@mulgrave> <42387C7C.9040407@pobox.com> <1111003679.5635.3.camel@mulgrave> <42389797.7000004@pobox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: from stat16.steeleye.com ([209.192.50.48]:55006 "EHLO hancock.sc.steeleye.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262836AbVCPWVu (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Mar 2005 17:21:50 -0500 In-Reply-To: <42389797.7000004@pobox.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , SCSI Mailing List , Linux Kernel On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 15:31 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > More info? Were they dropped on purpose, or just never arrived? > If dropped on purpose, what was the reason? You posted substantive updates to a maintained driver. Adam Radford is the maintainer, but I haven't heard anything from him (neither ACK, NAK or "this is my latest set of updates containing these patches") so could you poke him, please. James