From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE][PATCH] drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_{mm,mbox} Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 12:27:56 -0500 Message-ID: <1111080476.5994.13.camel@mulgrave> References: <0E3FA95632D6D047BA649F95DAB60E5703662770@exa-atlanta> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: from stat16.steeleye.com ([209.192.50.48]:53888 "EHLO hancock.sc.steeleye.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261979AbVCQR2L (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Mar 2005 12:28:11 -0500 In-Reply-To: <0E3FA95632D6D047BA649F95DAB60E5703662770@exa-atlanta> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: "Ju, Seokmann" Cc: 'Andrew Morton' , Linux Kernel , SCSI Mailing List On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 11:48 -0500, Ju, Seokmann wrote: > On Thursday, March 17, 2005 1:26 AM, Andrew wrote: > > Some of these things have already been done in Linus's > > post-2.6.11 tree and > > you patch throws lots of rejects. Please always work against the most > > recent kernel - 2.6.11 is very out of date. > Thank you for correction. I've created NEW patch against 2.6.11.4 which is > latest from kernel.org. This is still rejecting: patching file drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_mm.c Hunk #2 FAILED at 43. Hunk #4 FAILED at 68. Hunk #5 FAILED at 1217. Hunk #6 FAILED at 1225. Hunk #7 FAILED at 1245. 5 out of 7 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_mm.c.rej Could you rebase this patch to the bk snapshots so we can look at applying it? Thanks, James