From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
To: "Moore, Eric Dean" <Eric.Moore@lsil.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
kenneth.w.chen@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] - Fusion-MPT much faster as module
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 13:05:23 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1111518323.5520.60.camel@mulgrave> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <91888D455306F94EBD4D168954A9457C01AEB0A8@nacos172.co.lsil.com>
On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 11:40 -0700, Moore, Eric Dean wrote:
> History on this:
> Between the 3.01.16 and 3.01.18, we introduced new method
> to passing command line options to the driver. Some of the
> command line options are used for fine tuning dv(domain
> validation) in the driver. By accident, these command line options were
> wrapped around #ifdef MODULE in the 3.01.18 version of the driver.
> What this meant is when the driver is compiled built-in the kernel,
> the optimal settings for dv were ignored, thus poor performance.
OK, I'll add this to the queue.
Could I just point out that if your driver actually printed the results
of negotiation, this would have been an awful lot easier to debug.
Additionally, if you used the SPI transport class domain validation, the
issue wouldn't have arisen in the first place.
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-22 19:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-22 18:40 [PATCH] - Fusion-MPT much faster as module Moore, Eric Dean
2005-03-22 19:05 ` James Bottomley [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-03-22 20:35 Moore, Eric Dean
2005-03-23 4:07 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1111518323.5520.60.camel@mulgrave \
--to=james.bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=Eric.Moore@lsil.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=kenneth.w.chen@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox