From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: [PATCH] attach aic7xxx to the spi transport class. Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 14:17:50 -0500 Message-ID: <1113160671.6737.15.camel@mulgrave> References: <1113159507.6737.10.camel@mulgrave> <20050410190521.GH8669@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from stat16.steeleye.com ([209.192.50.48]:62166 "EHLO hancock.sc.steeleye.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261576AbVDJTR7 (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Apr 2005 15:17:59 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20050410190521.GH8669@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Luben Tuikov , SCSI Mailing List On Sun, 2005-04-10 at 20:05 +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > I thought QAS and IU were also U160 properties since the sym1010 supports > them. We just haven't found any drives yet that're willing to negotiate > them ... Theoretically, they are (and the 7xxx has support for them). What I find is that even when I have ultra320 drives willing to do QAS and IU, they refuse to negotiate them except at u320 speeds ... I can put them in, I just don't know how useful they actually are. James