From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alan Cox Subject: Re: [06/07] [PATCH] SCSI tape security: require CAP_ADMIN for SG_IO etc. Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 21:16:27 +0100 Message-ID: <1114805784.18330.297.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20050427171446.GA3195@kroah.com> <20050427171649.GG3195@kroah.com> <1114619928.18809.118.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1114694511.18809.187.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050429042014.GC25474@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from clock-tower.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:59865 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262942AbVD2USp (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Apr 2005 16:18:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20050429042014.GC25474@kroah.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Greg KH Cc: Kai Makisara , Greg KH , James Bottomley , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , stable@kernel.org, Justin Forbes , Zwane Mwaikambo , Cliff White , Theodore Ts'o , "Randy.Dunlap" , Chuck Wolber , torvalds@osdl.org, Andrew Morton On Gwe, 2005-04-29 at 05:20, Greg KH wrote: > > Ok thats the bit I needed to know > > So, do you still object to this patch being accepted? Switched to CAP_SYS_RAWIO I don't. Its the wrong answer long term I suspect but its definitely a good answer for now. Alan