From: Dmitry Yusupov <dmitry_yus@yahoo.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Cc: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>,
Sander <sander@humilis.net>,
David Hollis <dhollis@davehollis.com>,
Maciej Soltysiak <solt2@dns.toxicfilms.tv>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Re[2]: ata over ethernet question
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 12:05:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1115924747.25161.150.camel@beastie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1115923927.5042.18.camel@mulgrave>
On Thu, 2005-05-12 at 14:52 -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 00:00 +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > A follow up question - I recently used nbd to access a CD-ROM. It worked
> > nice, but, I had to read in 7 CDs, so, each time I had to replace a CD, I
> > had to stop the client, the server, then replace the CD, re-start the
> > server, re-start the client... I thought about extending NBD to (better)
> > support removable media, but then you start thinking about all those
> > features that your local block device has that don't get exported over
> > NBD...
>
> That's correct; NBD is basically just a remote data pipe type block
> device. It doesn't understand arbitrary packet commands.
>
> > Now, my understanding (sorry, without looking at any docs - yet) is, that
> > iSCSI is (or at least should be) free from these limitations. So, does it
> > make any sense at all extending NBD or just switch to iSCSI? Should NBD be
> > just kept simple as it is or would it be completely superseeded by iSCSI,
> > or is there still something that NBD does that iSCSI wouldn't (easily) do?
>
> Caveat: I've done quite a bit of work on nbd, so I'm biased. However,
> for what it does, nbd is extremely small, simple and efficient, so I
> think we'd want a hole in our head to replace it with something as
> complex and bloated as iSCSI---remember we'd need both a target and an
> initiator to do what nbd does today.
oh, please! don't compare nbd and iSCSI this way...
iSCSI is an emerging SAN technology, and the only technology to compare
is FC.
> However, there is room for improvement in nbd, notably the handling of
> packet commands, which looks to be eminently doable in the current
> infrastructure (this would basically make nbd a replicator for the linux
> block system, and would probably necessitate some client side changes to
> achieve). If you have any thoughts in this direction, you could drop an
> email to the maintainer.
>
> James
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-12 19:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1416215015.20050504193114@dns.toxicfilms.tv>
[not found] ` <1115236116.7761.19.camel@dhollis-lnx.sunera.com>
[not found] ` <1104082357.20050504231722@dns.toxicfilms.tv>
[not found] ` <1115305794.3071.5.camel@dhollis-lnx.sunera.com>
[not found] ` <20050507150538.GA800@favonius>
2005-05-10 22:00 ` Re[2]: ata over ethernet question Guennadi Liakhovetski
2005-05-10 23:14 ` Dmitry Yusupov
2005-05-11 5:42 ` [Iscsitarget-devel] " FUJITA Tomonori
2005-05-11 8:56 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2005-05-11 21:26 ` several messages Guennadi Liakhovetski
2005-05-12 2:16 ` Ming Zhang
2005-05-12 18:32 ` Dmitry Yusupov
2005-05-13 8:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-05-13 15:04 ` Dmitry Yusupov
2005-05-13 15:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-05-13 15:38 ` Dmitry Yusupov
2005-05-12 10:17 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2005-05-12 19:42 ` SCSI/ISCSI, hardware/software Bryan Henderson
2005-05-13 4:55 ` Douglas Gilbert
2005-05-13 10:34 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2005-05-13 23:58 ` Bryan Henderson
2005-05-12 18:52 ` Re[2]: ata over ethernet question James Bottomley
2005-05-12 19:05 ` Dmitry Yusupov [this message]
2005-05-12 19:15 ` James Bottomley
2005-05-12 19:44 ` Dmitry Yusupov
2005-05-13 8:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-05-13 16:18 ` Dmitry Yusupov
2005-05-13 8:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-05-13 18:50 ` iSCSI vs. NBD (was Re: ata over ethernet question) Guennadi Liakhovetski
2005-05-13 20:21 ` James Bottomley
2005-05-13 22:49 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2005-05-25 23:41 ` NBD (vs. iSCSI vs. EATA vs...) Guennadi Liakhovetski
2005-05-26 1:19 ` James Bottomley
2005-05-26 17:48 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1115924747.25161.150.camel@beastie \
--to=dmitry_yus@yahoo.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=dhollis@davehollis.com \
--cc=g.liakhovetski@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sander@humilis.net \
--cc=solt2@dns.toxicfilms.tv \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox