From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: iSCSI vs. NBD (was Re: ata over ethernet question) Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 16:21:33 -0400 Message-ID: <1116015693.6639.4.camel@mulgrave> References: <1416215015.20050504193114@dns.toxicfilms.tv> <1115236116.7761.19.camel@dhollis-lnx.sunera.com> <1104082357.20050504231722@dns.toxicfilms.tv> <1115305794.3071.5.camel@dhollis-lnx.sunera.com> <20050507150538.GA800@favonius> <1115923927.5042.18.camel@mulgrave> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from stat16.steeleye.com ([209.192.50.48]:34540 "EHLO hancock.sc.steeleye.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262533AbVEMUVu (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 May 2005 16:21:50 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Guennadi Liakhovetski Cc: Sander , David Hollis , Maciej Soltysiak , Linux Kernel , SCSI Mailing List On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 20:50 +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > I'll try to get some (thoughts):-) BTW, who is the maintainer of nbd? No > one in MAINTAINERS, in nbd.c only > * Copyright 1997-2000 Pavel Machek > * Parts copyright 2001 Steven Whitehouse > Is it Pavel then? Well, my copy of the MAINTAINERS file has this: NETWORK BLOCK DEVICE P: Paul Clements M: Paul.Clements@steeleye.com S: Maintained James