public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix reference counting for failed SCSI devices
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 07:27:23 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1117024043.5071.6.camel@mulgrave> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4294201D.4070304@suse.de>

On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 08:50 +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> >>+	class_device_put(&sdev->sdev_classdev);
> > 
> > This is unnecessary since the class device is simply occupying a private
> > area in the scsi_device.  As long as its never made visible to the
> > system, its refcount is irrelevant
> > 
> It's not. Whenever you try to rmmod the adapter it becomes highly
> relevant. If it doesn't crash you've at least generated a memleak as the
> class device is never freed.
> (And these are quite a few for Wide-SCSI Double-channel adapters ...)

?  Look at the code; you're not doing a put on a pointer to the
sdev_classdev, you're doing a put on a reference to it.

It's defined in scsi_device.h:

struct scsi_device {
	...
	struct class_device sdev_classdev;
	...
};

so it's contained within the scsi_device.  Freeing the scsi_device frees
the classdev (and the gendev).

James



  reply	other threads:[~2005-05-25 12:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-05-24  9:38 [PATCH] Fix reference counting for failed SCSI devices Hannes Reinecke
2005-05-24 22:57 ` James Bottomley
2005-05-25  6:50   ` Hannes Reinecke
2005-05-25 12:27     ` James Bottomley [this message]
2005-05-25 12:46       ` Hannes Reinecke
2005-05-25 14:58         ` James Bottomley
2005-05-25 15:16           ` Hannes Reinecke
2005-05-25 17:51             ` James Bottomley
2005-05-25 18:01               ` Matthew Wilcox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1117024043.5071.6.camel@mulgrave \
    --to=james.bottomley@steeleye.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox