From: Ming Zhang <mingz@ele.uri.edu>
To: open-iscsi <open-iscsi@googlegroups.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>,
Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>,
'SCSI Mailing List' <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] implement transport scan callout for iscsi
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 09:00:39 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1117026039.5527.28.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <001101c560c9$0870f280$03031eac@ivivity.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 637 bytes --]
about this 400K IOPS, both ini and target are using your HW solution?
ming
On Tue, 2005-05-24 at 21:28 -0400, open_iscsi wrote:
> Regarding the numbers, we get 400,000 IOPS with our hardware solution
> using
> multiple connections and multiple micro-engines. I have not tried
> multi-pathing but I can tell you that I had to count clocks to get
> that
> number and found that even a few extra clocks could mean a lot. So
> since
> multi-pathing takes a lot of extra clocks, then I think there is a
> benefit.
> However with a software solution the extra clocks for the multi-
> pathing may
> not be significant.
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-25 13:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <42936441.0b798bab.39a4.ffff9774SMTPIN_ADDED@mx.googlegroups.com>
2005-05-24 21:01 ` [PATCH RFC 2/2] implement transport scan callout for iscsi Mike Christie
2005-05-24 23:17 ` James Bottomley
2005-05-25 0:25 ` open_iscsi
2005-05-25 1:00 ` James Bottomley
2005-05-25 1:28 ` open_iscsi
2005-05-25 5:22 ` Dmitry Yusupov
2005-05-25 12:55 ` open_iscsi
2005-05-25 13:00 ` Ming Zhang [this message]
2005-05-25 13:08 ` open_iscsi
2005-05-25 15:18 ` Luben Tuikov
2005-05-25 18:04 ` James Bottomley
2005-05-25 18:32 ` Dmitry Yusupov
2005-05-25 19:42 ` James Bottomley
2005-05-26 1:38 ` open_iscsi
2005-05-25 2:20 open_iscsi
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-05-21 21:39 Mike Christie
2005-05-24 17:09 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1117026039.5527.28.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=mingz@ele.uri.edu \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
--cc=open-iscsi@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox