From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: RE: Problem Adding Transport Class support to fusion Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 11:39:10 -0500 Message-ID: <1117557550.4952.8.camel@mulgrave> References: <91888D455306F94EBD4D168954A9457C028C57FA@nacos172.co.lsil.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from stat16.steeleye.com ([209.192.50.48]:60650 "EHLO hancock.sc.steeleye.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261961AbVEaQjO (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 May 2005 12:39:14 -0400 In-Reply-To: <91888D455306F94EBD4D168954A9457C028C57FA@nacos172.co.lsil.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: "Moore, Eric Dean" Cc: SCSI Mailing List On Tue, 2005-05-31 at 10:25 -0600, Moore, Eric Dean wrote: > I suspect your using dated firmware. Try /proc/mpt/summary, > and check FwRev. Yes, that was it: the fw revision was 1.0.4.0 Updating to 1.3.39.0 allowed me to get at Page 0. Are there many cards in the field like this? > Also, have you remembered our cards support RAID? We kick > of DV when a drive is replaced failed drive in a mirror. That > is kicked off when fw sends ASYC event saying that the > driver must to DV on that hidden phys disk. Yes, we had a non-attachment scheme that Christoph suggested for the components of the RAID devices. > FYI - I'm getting ready to post SAS support for split drivers design. > I prefer that we push out generic DV support after we get the > SAS updates in, and some other bits of FC transport support > that have been waiting in the wings for several months. Well, this is more driven by me ... I need to get the generic DV working on u320, and the 1030 is the only u320 SCSI card I have to try it with. Thanks, James