* [PROBLEM] aic7xxx: DV failed to configure device
@ 2005-06-06 8:16 Denis Zaitsev
2005-06-06 8:19 ` Arjan van de Ven
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Denis Zaitsev @ 2005-06-06 8:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: linux-scsi
I'm testing an Adaptec SCSI controller + an IBM drive. All the things
used to be fine before I had made the low-level format of the drive
(thru the Ctrl-A Adaptec's menu). And now after
modprobe aic7xxx
I have:
scsi0 : Adaptec AIC7XXX EISA/VLB/PCI SCSI HBA DRIVER, Rev 6.2.36
<Adaptec 29160 Ultra160 SCSI adapter>
aic7892: Ultra160 Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 32/253 SCBs
scsi0:A:0:0: DV failed to configure device. Please file a bug report against this driver.
(scsi0:A:0): 160.000MB/s transfers (80.000MHz DT, offset 63, 16bit)
Vendor: IBM Model: DDYS-T09170N Rev: S80D
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 03
scsi0:A:0:0: Tagged Queuing enabled. Depth 32
SCSI device sda: 17916240 512-byte hdwr sectors (9173 MB)
SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back
SCSI device sda: 17916240 512-byte hdwr sectors (9173 MB)
SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back
sda: unknown partition table
Attached scsi disk sda at scsi0, channel 0, id 0, lun 0
The message
scsi0:A:0:0: DV failed to configure device. Please file a bug report against this driver.
had never appeared before the low-level format. But it seems that
after the format the drive still works fine.
So, what does this message mean? And can I just ignore it?
Some additional info: it's the PCI64 card installed in a 32-bit PCI
slot, Domain Validation is turned on thru the Adaptec BIOS setup.
Thanks in advance.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PROBLEM] aic7xxx: DV failed to configure device
2005-06-06 8:16 [PROBLEM] aic7xxx: DV failed to configure device Denis Zaitsev
@ 2005-06-06 8:19 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-06-06 9:03 ` Denis Zaitsev
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Arjan van de Ven @ 2005-06-06 8:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Denis Zaitsev; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-scsi
On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 14:16 +0600, Denis Zaitsev wrote:
> I'm testing an Adaptec SCSI controller + an IBM drive. All the things
> used to be fine before I had made the low-level format of the drive
> (thru the Ctrl-A Adaptec's menu). And now after
>
> modprobe aic7xxx
you failed to mention which exact kernel you were using...
(that matters since the aic7xxx driver changes a lot over time, and
especially it changed recently in this area a lot)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PROBLEM] aic7xxx: DV failed to configure device
2005-06-06 8:19 ` Arjan van de Ven
@ 2005-06-06 9:03 ` Denis Zaitsev
2005-06-06 14:34 ` James Bottomley
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Denis Zaitsev @ 2005-06-06 9:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arjan van de Ven; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-scsi
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 10:19:45AM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 14:16 +0600, Denis Zaitsev wrote:
> > I'm testing an Adaptec SCSI controller + an IBM drive. All the things
> > used to be fine before I had made the low-level format of the drive
> > (thru the Ctrl-A Adaptec's menu). And now after
> >
> > modprobe aic7xxx
>
>
> you failed to mention which exact kernel you were using...
Yes, I'm sorry. 2.6.10.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PROBLEM] aic7xxx: DV failed to configure device
2005-06-06 9:03 ` Denis Zaitsev
@ 2005-06-06 14:34 ` James Bottomley
2005-06-07 13:16 ` Denis Zaitsev
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: James Bottomley @ 2005-06-06 14:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Denis Zaitsev; +Cc: Arjan van de Ven, Linux Kernel, SCSI Mailing List
On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 15:03 +0600, Denis Zaitsev wrote:
> Yes, I'm sorry. 2.6.10.
That particular code was completely changed for 2.6.12-rc5; could you
see what that kernel makes of this, please?
Thanks,
James
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PROBLEM] aic7xxx: DV failed to configure device
2005-06-06 14:34 ` James Bottomley
@ 2005-06-07 13:16 ` Denis Zaitsev
2005-06-07 16:37 ` James Bottomley
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Denis Zaitsev @ 2005-06-07 13:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: James Bottomley; +Cc: Arjan van de Ven, Linux Kernel, SCSI Mailing List
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 09:34:37AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 15:03 +0600, Denis Zaitsev wrote:
> > Yes, I'm sorry. 2.6.10.
>
> That particular code was completely changed for 2.6.12-rc5; could you
> see what that kernel makes of this, please?
Ok, 2.6.12-rc5:
scsi0 : Adaptec AIC7XXX EISA/VLB/PCI SCSI HBA DRIVER, Rev 6.2.36
<Adaptec 29160 Ultra160 SCSI adapter>
aic7892: Ultra160 Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 32/253 SCBs
Vendor: IBM Model: DDYS-T09170N Rev: S80D
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 03
scsi0:A:0:0: Tagged Queuing enabled. Depth 32
target0:0:0: Beginning Domain Validation
WIDTH IS 1
(scsi0:A:0): 6.600MB/s transfers (16bit)
target0:0:0: Domain Validation skipping write tests
(scsi0:A:0): 160.000MB/s transfers (80.000MHz DT, offset 63, 16bit)
target0:0:0: Ending Domain Validation
SCSI device sda: 17916240 512-byte hdwr sectors (9173 MB)
SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back
SCSI device sda: 17916240 512-byte hdwr sectors (9173 MB)
SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back
sda: unknown partition table
Attached scsi disk sda at scsi0, channel 0, id 0, lun 0
It seems that things are in order, do I understand right? So, why and
how the low-level format affects the old driver's behaviour?
Thanks in advance.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PROBLEM] aic7xxx: DV failed to configure device
2005-06-07 13:16 ` Denis Zaitsev
@ 2005-06-07 16:37 ` James Bottomley
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: James Bottomley @ 2005-06-07 16:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Denis Zaitsev; +Cc: Arjan van de Ven, Linux Kernel, SCSI Mailing List
On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 19:16 +0600, Denis Zaitsev wrote:
> It seems that things are in order, do I understand right? So, why and
> how the low-level format affects the old driver's behaviour?
I can't answer that ... part of the reason for ditching the in-driver
aic7xxx DV is that it was where an astonishing number of bugs kept
turning up.
James
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-06-07 18:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-06-06 8:16 [PROBLEM] aic7xxx: DV failed to configure device Denis Zaitsev
2005-06-06 8:19 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-06-06 9:03 ` Denis Zaitsev
2005-06-06 14:34 ` James Bottomley
2005-06-07 13:16 ` Denis Zaitsev
2005-06-07 16:37 ` James Bottomley
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox