From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Christie Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/4] use scatter lists for all block pc requests and simplify hw handlers Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 19:04:09 -0500 Message-ID: <1118102649.42a4e479b5d0f@webmail.cs.wisc.edu> References: <1117847972.23638.62.camel@mina> <1117901234.5005.9.camel@mulgrave> <1117955727.4961.8.camel@mina> <1117964506.15294.130.camel@zezette> <20050606133135.GZ27119@marowsky-bree.de> Reply-To: device-mapper development Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20050606133135.GZ27119@marowsky-bree.de> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com To: device-mapper development , Lars Marowsky-Bree Cc: James Bottomley , Jens Axboe , linux-scsi List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Quoting Lars Marowsky-Bree : > On 2005-06-05T11:41:46, christophe varoqui > wrote: >=20 > > While the focus is in this area, I'd like to mention multipath tools > > userland checkers will need to insert SG request on queue head (Ed > > Gaggin will explain this at OLS). I guess the API is lacking there, a= nd > > would like to know if this feature is on your TODOs ... >=20 > It's on the TODO list. It's just not done yet. Essentially we need to b= e > able to set BW_RW_FAILFAST from user-space for SGIO. >=20 Isn't this a seperate issue? It looks like the RHAT bugzilla asks to be a= ble to insert directly at the head of the queue so you do you not have to wait f= or possibly a hundred IO to complete before the test IO. Setting failfast ju= st means in case of en error it will be returned faster (no wasting time retying). > This is Novell bugzilla #81694 and RHAT bugzilla #154436. >=20