From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ? Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 21:20:22 -0500 Message-ID: <1118715622.5079.88.camel@mulgrave> References: <20050607085710.GB9230@gmail.com> <1118590709.4967.6.camel@mulgrave> <20050613145000.GA12057@gmail.com> <1118674783.5079.9.camel@mulgrave> <20050613183719.GA8653@gmail.com> <1118695847.5079.41.camel@mulgrave> <20050613213307.GA8534@gmail.com> <1118699191.5079.49.camel@mulgrave> <20050613215923.GA8629@gmail.com> <1118700284.5079.52.camel@mulgrave> <20050613222527.GB8629@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from stat16.steeleye.com ([209.192.50.48]:21901 "EHLO hancock.sc.steeleye.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261349AbVFNCVR (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jun 2005 22:21:17 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20050613222527.GB8629@gmail.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Gregoire Favre Cc: dino@in.ibm.com, Andrew Morton , SCSI Mailing List , Linux Kernel On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 00:25 +0200, Gregoire Favre wrote: > Yes, due to those problem, I have reduced all devices speed on both > controllers. Now I think I can put the HD to 160 and my CD-writers to > 20 :-) (Maybe I could try to also put the DVD-Rom to 20). Actually, I think the problem is that the DVD-Rom thinks it can run at 20 but actually can't > Do you think it's safe to use this patched 2.6.12-rc6 (I could stay > under 2.6.12-rc2 till 2.6.12-rc7 or 2.6.12 comes out) ? Well ... look at it this way ... if no-one finds anything wrong with the patches, they'll be going straight into the kernel tree after 2.6.12, so I trust them as much as that ... James