From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ? Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 09:14:48 -0500 Message-ID: <1118844888.5045.18.camel@mulgrave> References: <1118081857.5045.49.camel@mulgrave> <20050607085710.GB9230@gmail.com> <1118590709.4967.6.camel@mulgrave> <20050613145000.GA12057@gmail.com> <1118674783.5079.9.camel@mulgrave> <20050613183719.GA8653@gmail.com> <1118695847.5079.41.camel@mulgrave> <20050613214208.GA7471@janus> <1118703593.5079.56.camel@mulgrave> <20050614214226.GA15560@janus> <20050615120237.GB19645@janus> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from stat16.steeleye.com ([209.192.50.48]:63910 "EHLO hancock.sc.steeleye.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261445AbVFOOPL (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jun 2005 10:15:11 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20050615120237.GB19645@janus> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Frank van Maarseveen Cc: Gr?goire Favre , dino@in.ibm.com, Andrew Morton , SCSI Mailing List , Linux Kernel On Wed, 2005-06-15 at 14:02 +0200, Frank van Maarseveen wrote: > The -rc6 aic7 driver needs just over 7 minutes to recover from this tape > unit. In -rc3 this was 80 seconds. -rc2 had no problem. > > I don't really need this old tape unit and I don't [re-]boot that often > so it is not a problem for me. Anyway, if something needs to be tested > then mail me a patch (for stock rc6) and I'll try it. Well, the patches to try are the scsi-misc ones: http://parisc-linux.org/~jejb/scsi_diffs/scsi-misc-2.6.diff James