From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] scsi host / scsi target state model update Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 12:44:14 -0400 Message-ID: <1121186655.4825.26.camel@mulgrave> References: <20050616181058.GA20923@us.ibm.com> <20050616181238.GB20923@us.ibm.com> <20050616181342.GC20923@us.ibm.com> <20050616181433.GD20923@us.ibm.com> <20050616181518.GE20923@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from stat16.steeleye.com ([209.192.50.48]:11683 "EHLO hancock.sc.steeleye.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261806AbVGLRvL (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jul 2005 13:51:11 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20050616181518.GE20923@us.ibm.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Mike Anderson Cc: SCSI Mailing List On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 11:15 -0700, Mike Anderson wrote: > Add a SCSI target state model similar to the SCSI device state model. The first three patches look good (sorry been a hectic month, just getting around to looking through them) so I'll stick them in scsi-misc and see how they work out. Currently, the target is really slaved to the devices, so we have no actual need of a target state model (if you destroy the last device on a target, the target is also destroyed). However, ressurecting this could be part of a more comprehensive target model if someone actually proves a need for it. James