Re: [PATCH] DEC hsg80 needs BLIST_REPORTLUN2

["Wilcox, Stephen P, CITPC" <spwilcox@att.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1313 bytes --]

Crap.  I was afraid that my mailer might mangle this...   I created the
patch with "diff -up" based on the info in "SubmittingPatches" in the
kernel source tree, but I must admit that I manually edited the patch so
that It would apply to RedHat's .src.rpms using their canned spec files.
The working (at least using RedHat's method) patch is attached this time
rather than pasted in.  If that one still fails to work, the single
change is all that's really needed.

-steve



On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 12:51 -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 13:26 -0400, Steve Wilcox wrote:
> > In order to properly report LUN's > 7, the DEC HSG80 definition in
> > scsi_devinfo.c needs to include BLIST_REPORTLUN2 rather than
> > BLIST_SPARSELUN.  I've tested this change with several HSG firmware
> > revisions and with both Emulex and Qlogic HBA's.
> 
> Well, your patch won't apply.  Apart from the breaking by the mailer,
> you have a curiosity in the last three lines (the DELL arrays) which are
> definitely missing tabs and spaces over what we have in the kernel
> (There are three spaces between "PV660F" and "PSEUDO" and there's a tab
> not a space before the comment).  How did you generate this diff?
> 
> Anyway, I can apply the single change manually.
> 
> James
> 
> 

[-- Attachment #2: Replaced Blocked File.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 511 bytes --]

********               McAfee GroupShield Exchange          **********
********  Alert generated at: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 01:29:05 PM Central Daylight Time
**********************************************************************


The file scsi-blacklist.patch has been replaced, as it is a file type that is known for spreading viruses. For assistance, please contact your local Desktop Support Personnel or refer to the following website for direction. http://antivirus.security.att.com/Default.htm