From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Drew Winstel Subject: Re: qla2xxx: does not respond to SCSI_IOCTL_PROBE_HOST Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 12:02:58 -0500 Message-ID: <1124989378.15175.17.camel@localhost> References: <1124915655.13251.16.camel@localhost> <20050824211348.GH8205@plap.qlogic.org> <20050825160902.GA17366@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail.dslreports.com ([209.123.192.187]:53474 "EHLO mail.dslr.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751202AbVHYRCc (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Aug 2005 13:02:32 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.dslr.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C7AF427BD for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 13:02:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.dslr.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (coral.dslreports.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13142-10 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 13:02:27 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20050825160902.GA17366@infradead.org> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Andrew Vasquez , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 17:09 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > And while we're at it we should add deprecation warnings for most of > the crufy ioctls in scsi_ioctl.c.. > Pardon my ignorance, but to which ioctls are you referring? Are practically all the ioctls now just junk, or is there a list somewhere of ones that are slated for deprecation and removal? Thanks, Drew