public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: SCSI development list <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SCSI core: fix leakage of scsi_cmnd's
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 10:56:29 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1126194989.4845.24.camel@mulgrave> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0509081045230.4503-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>

> The SCSI core has a problem with leakage of scsi_cmnd structs.  It occurs
> when a request is requeued; the request keeps its associated scsi_cmnd so
> that the core doesn't need to assign a new one.  However, the routines
> that read the device queue sometimes delete entries without bothering to
> free the associated scsi_cmnd.  Among other things, this bug manifests as
> error-handler processes remaining alive when a hot-pluggable device is
> unplugged in the middle of executing a command.
> 
> This patch (as559) fixes the problem by calling scsi_put_command and 
> scsi_release_buffers at the appropriate times.  It also reorganizes a 
> couple of bits of code, adding a new subroutine to find the scsi_cmnd 
> associated with a requeued request.

Nate Dailey also had a patch for this, a reply to which is incomplete
still in my drafts folder.

The bottom line is that I don't think any modifications to the prep_fn()
are necessary.  It's guarded by REQ_DONTPREP, so is never called again
if we actually manage to prepare a command fully.  The returns from it
are:

BLKPREP_DEFER:  Requeue the command for re-preparation (no resources
should be allocated)

BLKPREP_KILL: destroy the command (no resources should be allocated)

BLKPREP_OK: Command is prepared, resources are allocated, REQ_DONTPREP
is set to prevent any additional prep_fn() call.

So in the DEFER or KILL case, all you need to worry about is resources
you may have allocated in the current prep_fn() invocation.  It seems to
me that we do release these correctly, unless I'm missing something?

The second problem is a bug (also spotted by Nate).  However, what I
think we should be doing in this case is calling __scsi_done with
DID_NO_CONNECT which should clean up correctly and also send the error
indications back up the stack to the correct sources (that's what we do
in scsi_dispatch_cmd() for this problem).

James



  reply	other threads:[~2005-09-08 15:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-09-08 14:56 [PATCH] SCSI core: fix leakage of scsi_cmnd's Alan Stern
2005-09-08 15:56 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2005-09-08 16:44   ` Alan Stern
2005-09-08 17:13     ` James Bottomley
2005-09-08 20:49       ` Alan Stern
2005-09-09 18:40         ` James Bottomley
2005-09-13 17:00           ` Alan Stern
2005-09-13 21:34             ` James Bottomley
2005-09-14 13:59               ` Alan Stern

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1126194989.4845.24.camel@mulgrave \
    --to=james.bottomley@steeleye.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox