From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/16] qla2xxx: update qla2xxx driver to 8.01.02-k. Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 18:47:44 -0500 Message-ID: <1129852064.3115.18.camel@mulgrave> References: <20051013231534.27191.19815.sendpatchset@plap.qlogic.com> <20051019174209.GP9087@plap.qlogic.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from stat9.steeleye.com ([209.192.50.41]:55172 "EHLO hancock.sc.steeleye.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964948AbVJUOTN (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Oct 2005 10:19:13 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20051019174209.GP9087@plap.qlogic.org> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Andrew Vasquez Cc: Linux-SCSI Mailing List On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 10:42 -0700, Andrew Vasquez wrote: > Given all the activity promted with this patchset, could you provide > some insight on which patches you have queued for inclusion into > scsi-misc? > > The scsi-misc-2.6 GIT tree has been dormant for some time and I would > like to have some direction on which patches I should cherrypick and > rebase given a number of updates to linux-2.6.git for the qla2xxx > driver as well as the rport interface updates proposed by James S. Actually, none at the moment. When a patch set comes as a list of patches, I generally tend to assume that they are all interdependent (although sometimes if there's objection to only a single component patch, I will pull that out if possible). So for the monolithic set, I'll put them in when all the objections are worked out on the list. If there are pieces I can apply now which everyone's happy with, tell me what they are. James