Linux SCSI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
To: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Cc: linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.net>
Subject: Re: infinite loop with 36 Byte inquiry (sbp2 regression in 2.6.14-rcX)
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 17:43:22 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1130107402.3437.54.camel@mulgrave> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <435ADA6D.4040705@s5r6.in-berlin.de>

On Sun, 2005-10-23 at 02:33 +0200, Stefan Richter wrote:
> I just noticed that devices which require sbp2's inquiry hack are not 
> usable anymore. I don't know when the regression crept in since I don't 
> remember when I used the affected device successfully the last time. One 
> thing is for sure: The code change which triggered the regression took 
> not place in sbp2 itself.
> 
> The device in question is an older 2.5" FireWire disk, DViCO Momobay 
> CX-1. What happens under Linux 2.6.14-rc5 is this: Without debug logging 
> turned on, it seems as if the process which started the sbp2 probe 
> (knodemgrd or modprobe) is hanging in D state. But debug logging enabled 
> in sbp2 reveals that it isn't locked up but rather caught in a loop, 
> sending inquiry commands:
> 
> > Oct 23 01:26:59 shuttle kernel: ieee1394: sbp2: sbp2_module_init
> > Oct 23 01:26:59 shuttle kernel: sbp2: $Rev: 1306 $ Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>
> > Oct 23 01:26:59 shuttle kernel: ieee1394: sbp2: sbp2_probe
> > Oct 23 01:26:59 shuttle kernel: ieee1394: sbp2: sbp2_alloc_device
> > Oct 23 01:26:59 shuttle kernel: ieee1394: sbp2: sbp2_alloc_device: allocated hostinfo
> > Oct 23 01:26:59 shuttle kernel: scsi0 : SCSI emulation for IEEE-1394 SBP-2 Devices
> > Oct 23 01:26:59 shuttle kernel: ieee1394: sbp2: sbp2_parse_unit_directory
> > Oct 23 01:26:59 shuttle kernel: ieee1394: sbp2: sbp2_management_agent_addr = f0010000
> > Oct 23 01:26:59 shuttle kernel: ieee1394: sbp2: sbp2_unit_characteristics = a08
> > Oct 23 01:26:59 shuttle kernel: ieee1394: sbp2: sbp2_command_set_spec_id = 609e
> > Oct 23 01:26:59 shuttle kernel: ieee1394: sbp2: sbp2_command_set = 104d8
> > Oct 23 01:26:59 shuttle kernel: ieee1394: sbp2: sbp2_firmware_revision = 2800
> > Oct 23 01:26:59 shuttle kernel: ieee1394: sbp2: Node 1-01:1023: Using 36byte inquiry workaround

I don't see any looping in the traces, could you characterise what's
going on for those of us who haven't fully explored the sbp2 driver?

However, at a brief examination it looks like you do quite a lot of
response snooping.  This always was broken for commands from userspace,
but it's completely broken now we only use scatter/gather commands from
block.

Secondly, I don't think your inquiry hack is effective any more, because
you try to alter request_bufflen, which doesn't carry the length of a
s/g command.

We have a device flag: BLIST_INQUIRY_36 which restricts the named
devices only to having 36 byte inquiries sent.  Could your internal
table be migrated up to the mid-layer list to avoid the issue
altogether?

James


James



  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-10-23 22:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-10-23  0:33 infinite loop with 36 Byte inquiry (sbp2 regression in 2.6.14-rcX) Stefan Richter
2005-10-23  7:46 ` Stefan Richter
2005-10-23 22:43 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2005-10-24  6:58   ` Stefan Richter
2005-10-24 15:31     ` James Bottomley
2005-10-24 19:05       ` Stefan Richter
2005-10-24  7:17   ` Stefan Richter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1130107402.3437.54.camel@mulgrave \
    --to=james.bottomley@steeleye.com \
    --cc=bcollins@debian.net \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox