From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: [DOC PATCH] T10/04-262r8 Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 11:22:43 -0500 Message-ID: <1131553363.3271.1.camel@mulgrave> References: <4371BB82.3090208@gmx.de> <4371C557.80807@gmx.de> <4371F7C3.5080702@rtr.ca> <43720232.6090609@gmx.de> <4372172A.50003@gmx.de> <43721C3C.1010103@pobox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from stat9.steeleye.com ([209.192.50.41]:3288 "EHLO hancock.sc.steeleye.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751452AbVKIQW7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Nov 2005 11:22:59 -0500 In-Reply-To: <43721C3C.1010103@pobox.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff Garzik Cc: t.schorpp@gmx.de, Linux SCSI list > > #define ATA_16 0x85 /* 16-byte pass-thru */ > > #define ATA_12 0xa1 /* 12-byte pass-thru */ > > This is a bit silly. We should just remove the T10 doc reference, if > people are going to be continually submitting patches to update this doc id. Agreed ... especially since 04-262 is just a proposed update to SAT which is what actually defines these command opcodes, so the comment isn't even correct. James