[PATCH 0/8] iscsi update

[PATCH 0/8] iscsi update

[Mike Christie]

I get to be the patch monkey again so here is a iscsi update. The
following patches except 01 and 04 are bug fixes. Patch 01 and 04 begin
to add support for other interconnects like rdma. We are not sending
support for rdma at this time. Those two patches should be netlink and
sysfs values that are some what interesting for the code we have in
mainline. If someone has a problem with those patches the patchset can
live without them though (it will apply at a offset but be ok).

We know we are late for 2.6.15 and that those two patches do not qualify
for rc bugfixes so we understand if this gets queued to 2.6.16-rc1.
Patches were made against scsi-misc but apply to scsi-rc-fixes.

Re: [PATCH 0/8] iscsi update

[Wang Zhenyu]

On 2005.11.30 13:12:33 +0000, Mike Christie wrote:
> 
>    I get to be the patch monkey again so here is a iscsi update. The
>    following patches except 01 and 04 are bug fixes. Patch 01 and 04 begin
>    to add support for other interconnects like rdma. We are not sending
>    support for rdma at this time. Those two patches should be netlink and
>    sysfs values that are some what interesting for the code we have in
>    mainline. If someone has a problem with those patches the patchset can
>    live without them though (it will apply at a offset but be ok).
>    We know we are late for 2.6.15 and that those two patches do not qualify
>    for rc bugfixes so we understand if this gets queued to 2.6.16-rc1.
>    Patches were made against scsi-misc but apply to scsi-rc-fixes.

ping for this patchset? These patches except rdma bits are all important fixes
for iscsi_tcp. James, is there any problem with them to scsi-rc-fixes? 
I think it's good to be in 2.6.15, and that keeps mainline kernel update with
our svn version. 

thanks