From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: [PATCH] ibmvscsi kexec fix Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2005 20:52:34 -0600 Message-ID: <1133751154.3320.1.camel@mulgrave> References: <20051115155300.GA26724@cs.umn.edu> <20051202192820.GA10115@cs.umn.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from stat9.steeleye.com ([209.192.50.41]:45205 "EHLO hancock.sc.steeleye.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750718AbVLECwf (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Dec 2005 21:52:35 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20051202192820.GA10115@cs.umn.edu> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: boutcher@cs.umn.edu Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Michael Ellerman On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 13:28 -0600, Dave C Boutcher wrote: > James, if this doesn't make it into 2.6.15 it won't totally break > my heart, since I'm not sure how many people are using ppc64 > kexec, but was there some reason this patch wasn't included in > your 2.6.15 fixes? Because it arrived in the flood of email I had when I got back from holiday and I missed it, I'm afraid. James