From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: Fw: crash on x86_64 - mm related? Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 11:45:30 -0600 Message-ID: <1134409531.9994.13.camel@mulgrave> References: <20051201195657.GB7236@tau.solarneutrino.net> <20051202180326.GB7634@tau.solarneutrino.net> <20051202194447.GA7679@tau.solarneutrino.net> <20051206160815.GC11560@tau.solarneutrino.net> <20051206204336.GA12248@tau.solarneutrino.net> <20051212165443.GD17295@tau.solarneutrino.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Ryan Richter , Hugh Dickins , Kai Makisara , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 09:40 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > I think it's the "sdev->single_lun" test at the very top of the function, > where "sdev" was initialized with "q->queuedata". So it looks like > somebody free'd the request_queue structure before the IO completed. > > Definitely sounds like something screwy in SCSI.. I don't think this is VM > related. Welcome back home. This is that SCSI patch you reversed just before you went away. If you put it back again, the problem will go away ... James