From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: matthew@wil.cx, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [SCSI] fix scsi_reap_target() device_del from atomic context
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 09:58:56 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1135353536.3728.15.camel@mulgrave> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051223073840.7110dbb0.akpm@osdl.org>
On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 07:38 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com> wrote:
> > There is a potential improvement, in that could be done which is only to
> > use the workqueue if we're in atomic context. However, I elected to
> > leave playing with that cleanup until after 2.6.15
>
> We don't have a way of determining whether we're in atomic context
> (in_atomic() only works with CONFIG_PREEMPT). If scsi internally knows what
> context things are in then that'll work OK.
Yes, that's what I thought ... and we don't really have a good way of
identifying this from the reap_target invocations (because of the way
most in-context paths could come back to us via a softirq).
> > There is also the point that I now have two of these allocations of
> > structures containing a workqueue and a pointer in separate instances.
> > It does look like this might be an improvement to the API (i.e. a
> > workqueue use that manages the allocation of the actual work_struct).
>
> Perhaps you could use work_struct.data for the scsi_target* and get back to
> the work_struct via container_of().
Could you elaborate some more on this? If I simply use the starget
pointer as my work_struct.data, how do I get back to the actual
work_struct for me to free it? It's not passed in to the function as
far as I can tell. But even if I do this, I still have to manage the
allocation and deallocation of the work_struct.
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-23 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200512212359.jBLNxluV016971@hera.kernel.org>
2005-12-23 6:13 ` [SCSI] fix scsi_reap_target() device_del from atomic context Andrew Morton
2005-12-23 12:15 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-12-23 15:27 ` James Bottomley
2005-12-23 15:38 ` Andrew Morton
2005-12-23 15:58 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2005-12-24 3:54 ` Andrew Morton
2005-12-23 20:05 ` Andrew Vasquez
2005-12-23 20:30 ` James Bottomley
2005-12-23 20:46 ` Andrew Vasquez
2005-12-23 20:43 ` Sergey Vlasov
2005-12-23 20:53 ` James Bottomley
2005-12-23 21:26 ` Sergey Vlasov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1135353536.3728.15.camel@mulgrave \
--to=james.bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox