From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] SCSI bug fixes for 2.6.16-rc1 Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 17:09:50 -0600 Message-ID: <1138748990.3307.33.camel@mulgrave> References: <1138741016.3307.20.camel@mulgrave> <43DFD316.3080100@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from stat9.steeleye.com ([209.192.50.41]:38098 "EHLO hancock.sc.steeleye.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751055AbWAaXKA (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jan 2006 18:10:00 -0500 In-Reply-To: <43DFD316.3080100@us.ibm.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: brking@us.ibm.com Cc: SCSI Mailing List On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 15:13 -0600, Brian King wrote: > Any reason the other sg patch I submitted didn't get pushed? Er ... I didn't notice it go by and no-one told me? > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsi&m=113753907627483&w=2 > > I was hoping to see this one go into the rc fixes, since without > it ipr's RAID configuration tools do not work. In theory, it only affects the sg path, the path via the ULD device node should already be fixed, so any management tool could use the sd (or st or sr) node instead ... you probably want to do that anyway to avoid mapping issues between the sg and sd nodes. James