From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alan Cox Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] libata: Add ata_host_flags Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 21:54:26 +0100 Message-ID: <1151355266.27147.78.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <200606071625.k57GPrit014721@d01av01.pok.ibm.com> <448CDEF3.1000703@pobox.com> <448DB360.8010504@us.ibm.com> <44A02DD5.1030405@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from outpipe-village-512-1.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:19373 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932103AbWFZUiZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jun 2006 16:38:25 -0400 In-Reply-To: <44A02DD5.1030405@us.ibm.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: brking@us.ibm.com Cc: Jeff Garzik , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Ar Llu, 2006-06-26 am 13:56 -0500, ysgrifennodd Brian King: > Jeff, any further thoughts about this? I had been trying to avoid having > any host_set type of data for the SAS usage of libata in part due to > not seeing a need and also due to a comment Bartlomiej made a while back: > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-ide&m=112842136431977&w=2 Well if anything we seem to be going the other way, in order to get things like Simplex working with legacy mode the legacy setup needs the two ports on the same host_set with differing IRQ/ports. Alan