From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Hansen Subject: Re: aic7xxx broken in 2.6.18-rc3-mm2 Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 16:06:43 -0700 Message-ID: <1155337603.7574.61.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1155334308.7574.50.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1155335237.3552.48.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> <1155335506.7574.54.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1155336653.3552.54.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from e35.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.153]:433 "EHLO e35.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751249AbWHKXG6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Aug 2006 19:06:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1155336653.3552.54.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux scsi , Andrew Morton , Alexis Bruemmer , Mike Anderson On Fri, 2006-08-11 at 17:50 -0500, James Bottomley wrote: > > 0000:02:01.0 0100: 9005:00cf (rev 01) > > 0000:02:01.1 0100: 9005:00cf (rev 01) > > OK strike that. The aic94xx cards all have IDs like 9005:04XX > > There does seem to be a cockup in the initialisation tables, but I can't > see how it could affect what you're seeing. (PCI_DEVICE() uses the .name > = value initialisation method and the fields following are unnamed). Do > you build both of these into the kernel, and if so does it work when > they're both modular? Yep, I build both of them in. Making them both modular will require a wee bit more time, as the aic7xxx has my root disk on it, and I don't have any initrds. In any case, I'm starting to get some funky results. I can't get the problem to reappear in the tree where I was doing the bisect, but my development tree where I first saw it is still broken. I'll do some more digging and get out a more reliable bug report. -- Dave